* Minimum Supported x86 microarchitecture @ 2015-04-15 15:09 Kavanagh, Mark B [not found] ` <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F846DA64E3-pww93C2UFcwu0RiL9chJVbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Kavanagh, Mark B @ 2015-04-15 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Hi, The recent reimplementation of rte_memcpy in DPDK v2.0.0 seems to have a placed an implicit floor on the microarchitecture/Instruction set supported by DPDK. For example, I can't compile head of OVS against DPDK 2.0 with gcc without passing the 'msse3' flag; this points to an implicit minimum supported CPU of 'core2'. More discussion on same is available here: http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-April/053523.html Can anyone confirm or deny this, and is/should it be documented? Thanks in advance, Mark ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F846DA64E3-pww93C2UFcwu0RiL9chJVbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Minimum Supported x86 microarchitecture [not found] ` <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F846DA64E3-pww93C2UFcwu0RiL9chJVbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> @ 2015-04-15 16:05 ` Bruce Richardson 2015-04-15 16:09 ` Kavanagh, Mark B 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Bruce Richardson @ 2015-04-15 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kavanagh, Mark B; +Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 03:09:39PM +0000, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote: > Hi, > > The recent reimplementation of rte_memcpy in DPDK v2.0.0 seems to have a placed an implicit floor on the microarchitecture/Instruction set supported by DPDK. > > For example, I can't compile head of OVS against DPDK 2.0 with gcc without passing the 'msse3' flag; this points to an implicit minimum supported CPU of 'core2'. More discussion on same is available here: http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-April/053523.html > > Can anyone confirm or deny this, and is/should it be documented? > > Thanks in advance, > Mark SSE3 is the minimum necessary. However, I believe all x86_64 cpus have at least SSE3 support, so this should only be a problem with 32-bit builds. Is this the case for you? /Bruce ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Minimum Supported x86 microarchitecture 2015-04-15 16:05 ` Bruce Richardson @ 2015-04-15 16:09 ` Kavanagh, Mark B 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Kavanagh, Mark B @ 2015-04-15 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richardson, Bruce; +Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org >-----Original Message----- >From: Richardson, Bruce >Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 5:05 PM >To: Kavanagh, Mark B >Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org >Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Minimum Supported x86 microarchitecture > >On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 03:09:39PM +0000, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The recent reimplementation of rte_memcpy in DPDK v2.0.0 seems to have a placed an >implicit floor on the microarchitecture/Instruction set supported by DPDK. >> >> For example, I can't compile head of OVS against DPDK 2.0 with gcc without passing the >'msse3' flag; this points to an implicit minimum supported CPU of 'core2'. More >discussion on same is available here: http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015- >April/053523.html >> >> Can anyone confirm or deny this, and is/should it be documented? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Mark > >SSE3 is the minimum necessary. However, I believe all x86_64 cpus have at least >SSE3 support, so this should only be a problem with 32-bit builds. Is this the >case for you? > >/Bruce Hey Bruce, No, I'm compiling on an IVB system. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-15 16:09 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-04-15 15:09 Minimum Supported x86 microarchitecture Kavanagh, Mark B [not found] ` <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F846DA64E3-pww93C2UFcwu0RiL9chJVbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> 2015-04-15 16:05 ` Bruce Richardson 2015-04-15 16:09 ` Kavanagh, Mark B
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).