dev.dpdk.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Minimum Supported x86 microarchitecture
@ 2015-04-15 15:09 Kavanagh, Mark B
       [not found] ` <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F846DA64E3-pww93C2UFcwu0RiL9chJVbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kavanagh, Mark B @ 2015-04-15 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org

Hi,

The recent reimplementation of rte_memcpy in DPDK v2.0.0 seems to have a placed an implicit floor on the microarchitecture/Instruction set supported by DPDK.

For example, I can't compile head of OVS against DPDK 2.0 with gcc without passing the 'msse3' flag; this points to an implicit minimum  supported CPU of 'core2'. More discussion on same is available here: http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-April/053523.html

Can anyone confirm or deny this, and is/should it be documented?

Thanks in advance,
Mark

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-15 16:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-15 15:09 Minimum Supported x86 microarchitecture Kavanagh, Mark B
     [not found] ` <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F846DA64E3-pww93C2UFcwu0RiL9chJVbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-15 16:05   ` Bruce Richardson
2015-04-15 16:09     ` Kavanagh, Mark B

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).