From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] Move common functions in eal_thread.c Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:03:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20150422090311.GA5652@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1429386161-12490-1-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com> <1429386191-12537-1-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com> <20150421142535.GA11524@bricha3-MOBL3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" To: Ravi Kerur Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:28:24PM -0700, Ravi Kerur wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Bruce Richardson < > bruce.richardson-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >=20 > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 12:43:06PM -0700, Ravi Kerur wrote: > > > Changes in v6 > > > Remove RTE_EXEC_ENV_BSDAPP from eal_common_thread.c file. > > > Add pthread_setname_np/pthread_set_name_np for Linux/FreeBSD > > > respectively. Plan to use _getname_ in RTE_LOG when available. > > > Use existing rte_get_systid() in RTE_LOG to print thread_id. > > > > Hi Ravi > > > > I think the change to add names to the threads might be better in an > > existing > > patch as it is separate from the change of making the code common. > > [The code changes for the names also seems to have issues with it, as > > described in comments below] > > >=20 > Hi Bruce, >=20 > Thanks for your comments. Linux/FreeBSD has different APIs >=20 > pthread_setname_np and pthread_getname_np in Linux > pthread_set_name_np in FreeBSD. FreeBSD has no "_get_name_" counterpart= API. >=20 > API signatures are different as well. Current plan is to use > "_setname_"/"_set_name_" appropriately and leave out "_getname_" until = it > is available in FreeBSD. >=20 > Are you suggesting to use separate patch for set/get pthread names? Yes, I think that would be better. Have one patch just for moving the cod= e to a common location, then a second patch for adding in thread names sinc= e its really a discrete unit of work. Apart from the bug with Linux vfio thread= , the idea and implementation looks really good, and something we would like to= have. /Bruce >=20 > More inline. >=20 >=20 > > > > > > Changes in v5 > > > Rebase to latest code. > > > > > > Changes in v4 > > > None > > > > > > Changes in v3 > > > Changed subject to be more explicit on file name inclusion. > > > > > > Changes in v2 > > > None > > > > > > Changes in v1 > > > eal_thread.c has minor differences between Linux and BSD, move > > > entire file into common directory. > > > Use RTE_EXEC_ENV_BSDAPP to differentiate on minor differences. > > > Rename eal_thread.c to eal_common_thread.c > > > Makefile changes to reflect file move and name change. > > > Fix checkpatch warnings. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ravi Kerur > > > --- > > > examples/vhost/main.c | 18 ++- > > > examples/vhost_xen/main.c | 18 ++- > > > lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/Makefile | 2 +- > > > lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c | 7 + > > > lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_thread.c | 152 > > --------------------- > > > lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_thread.c | 147 > > +++++++++++++++++++- > > > lib/librte_eal/common/eal_thread.h | 5 + > > > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/Makefile | 2 + > > > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 10 ++ > > > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c | 11 ++ > > > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio_mp_sync.c | 22 ++- > > > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_thread.c | 152 > > +-------------------- > > > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_timer.c | 15 +- > > > 13 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 311 deletions(-) > > > > > > > <<>> > > > > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio_mp_sync.c > > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio_mp_sync.c > > > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ > > > #include > > > #include > > > #include > > > +#include > > > > > > /* sys/un.h with __USE_MISC uses strlen, which is unsafe */ > > > #ifdef __USE_MISC > > > @@ -54,6 +55,7 @@ > > > > > > #include "eal_filesystem.h" > > > #include "eal_pci_init.h" > > > +#include "eal_thread.h" > > > > > > /** > > > * @file > > > @@ -374,20 +376,36 @@ int > > > pci_vfio_mp_sync_setup(void) > > > { > > > int ret; > > > + char thread_name[RTE_THREAD_NAME_LEN]; > > > > > > if (vfio_mp_sync_socket_setup() < 0) { > > > RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Failed to set up local socket!\n")= ; > > > return -1; > > > } > > > > > > + snprintf(thread_name, RTE_THREAD_NAME_LEN, > > > + "pci-vfio-mp-sync"); > > > > This string is too long. According to the man page (Fedora Linux): > > "The thread name is a meaningful C language string, whose length is > > restricted to 16 charac=E2=80=90 > > ters, including the terminating null byte ('\0')." > > I make the string 16+ null, i.e. 17 in total. > > >=20 > My mistake, will fix it. >=20 > > > > > + > > > ret =3D pthread_create(&socket_thread, NULL, > > > pci_vfio_mp_sync_thread, NULL); > > > if (ret) { > > > - RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Failed to create thread for > > communication with " > > > - "secondary processes!\n"); > > > + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, > > > + "Failed to create thread for communication wi= th " > > > + "secondary processes!\n"); > > > > Should not split the error message string across multiple lines as it > > breaks > > git grep searches for the error message. > > >=20 > Will fix it. >=20 > > > > > + close(mp_socket_fd); > > > + return -1; > > > + } > > > + > > > + ret =3D pthread_setname_np(socket_thread, thread_name); > > > + > > > + if (ret) { > > > + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, > > > + "Failed to set thread name for " > > > + "secondary processes!\n"); > > > close(mp_socket_fd); > > > return -1; > > > > Do we really want to return with an error here. Right now I can't run= any > > apps > > since I get an error on init of PCI - due to the name string being to= o > > long for > > Linux. (Things seem fine on BSD). Failing to name a thread doesn't se= em to > > be > > a fatal error IMHO. > > > > > When I coded understanding was that pthread _set_ APIs should not fail > (excluding bugs whilst calling the API), since _get_ APIs will be calle= d > subsequently for logging and debugging it will not be of any help if I = let > program continue after _set_ failure. I will change the code to just lo= g an > error and return success. >=20 > Thanks, > Ravi >=20 >=20 > > Regards, > > /Bruce > > > >