From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Hall Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use pthread_setname APIs Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:19:14 -0700 Message-ID: <20150423001914.GB5966@mhcomputing.net> References: <1429736748-16874-1-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com> <20150422155744.6c41b35d@urahara> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150422155744.6c41b35d@urahara> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 03:57:44PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Since it possible to have multiple DPDK applications in same environment, > and the thread name size is so limited, I wonder if this is a good idea. Why not try to opportunistically make the code easier to debug? DPDK is not always the easiest thing to debug, but at least it's way better than the kernel. Matthew.