From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] rte_sched: expand scheduler hierarchy for more VLAN's Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 10:32:59 -0700 Message-ID: <20150511103259.3e602773@urahara> References: <1431364071-27298-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <1431364071-27298-3-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <8edea4c81f624728bb5f0476b680c410@BRMWP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Stephen Hemminger To: Neil Horman Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com (mail-pa0-f53.google.com [209.85.220.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B688BFE5 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:32:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pabtp1 with SMTP id tp1so115104167pab.2 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 10:32:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8edea4c81f624728bb5f0476b680c410@BRMWP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, 11 May 2015 17:20:07 +0000 Neil Horman wrote: > Have you run this through the ABI checker? Seems like this would alter lots of > pointer offsets. > Neil No, I have not run it through ABI checker. It would change the ABI for applications using qos_sched but will not change layout of mbuf. But my assumption was that as part of release process the ABI version would change rather than doing for each patch that gets merged.