From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] eal: uio irq fixes and enhancements Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:57:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20150513085659.GA12276@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1430239000-30881-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <10038698.H9HDUp8o5h@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582E43775 for ; Wed, 13 May 2015 10:57:04 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10038698.H9HDUp8o5h@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:02:20PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-04-28 09:36, Stephen Hemminger: > > This set of patches starts out with fixing a regression where > > uio_pci_generic broke link state interrupt, then adds better > > management of PCI config space. > > > > Will leave up to document writers to update various release > > notes and API manuals as they see fit. > > > > Also, needs what ever shared library map file updates which > > maybe required when using dynamic libraries. But that should > > not stop acceptance of this patch set. > > No, an incomplete patch cannot be accepted. > There are several solutions: > - Siobhan and Neil accept to work on doc and .map file > - You provide a good v2 > - Someone else finish this patchset > - The bug remains (not a solution) Merge patch one on it's own to fix the issue? I don't think patch 1 requires any further doc or ABI map file changes, does it? /Bruce