From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] examples/tep_termination:initialize
 the VXLAN sample
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 16:53:45 -0700
Message-ID: <20150515165345.007a8919@urahara>
References: <1431670141-7835-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>
 <1431670141-7835-2-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com (mail-pd0-f172.google.com
 [209.85.192.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD115A40
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 16 May 2015 01:53:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pdbqa5 with SMTP id qa5so34476767pdb.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 15 May 2015 16:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1431670141-7835-2-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

I agree that this is great to see a real example of this

On Fri, 15 May 2015 14:08:52 +0800
Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> +static unsigned
> +check_ports_num(unsigned nb_ports)
> +{
> +	unsigned valid_nb_ports = nb_ports;
> +	unsigned portid;
> +
> +	if (nb_ports > nb_ports) {
> +		RTE_LOG(INFO, VHOST_PORT, "\nSpecified port number(%u) exceeds total system port number(%u)\n",
> +			nb_ports, nb_ports);
> +		nb_ports = nb_ports;

This looks repetative, and wrong, is it something to shut up a compiler warning?
or something that happened as result of global replace?