From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add toeplitz hash algorithm used by RSS
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:36:41 +0100
Message-ID: <20150616103641.GB8644@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <1430832011-17764-1-git-send-email-medvedkinv@gmail.com>
 <1431097092-19790-1-git-send-email-medvedkinv@gmail.com>
 <2783732.C59rBDiv7h@xps13> <1943830.H0qqKjE30e@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7384DC312
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 12:36:47 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1943830.H0qqKjE30e@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:07:28AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-06-03 16:07, Thomas Monjalon:
> > 2015-05-08 10:58, Vladimir Medvedkin:
> > > Software implementation of the Toeplitz hash function used by RSS.
> > > Can be used either for packet distribution on single queue NIC
> > > or for simulating of RSS computation on specific NIC (for example
> > > after GRE header decapsulating).
> > > 
> > > v3 changes
> > > - Rework API to be more generic
> > > - Add sctp_tag into tuple
> > > 
> > > v2 changes
> > > - Add ipv6 support
> > > - Various style fixes
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <medvedkinv@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  lib/librte_hash/Makefile    |   1 +
> > >  lib/librte_hash/rte_thash.h | 207 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 
> > Without any comment, it seems this v3 is approved.
> > Maybe that this patch would be even better by implementing some unit tests.
> > I wonder if the hash chapter of the prog guide could list the different
> > algorithms and why/when use them?
> 
> Bruce, any opinion?
> Don't you think that unit tests are required?

Sorry, I missed this patch set. I'll take a look at it today.

/Bruce