From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Chemparathy Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] tile: initial TILE-Gx support. Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 10:03:39 -0700 Message-ID: <20150622100339.33a79fc6@cchemparathy-ubuntu> References: <1434741309-22415-1-git-send-email-cchemparathy@ezchip.com> <1526894.tvBQFEdQvi@xps13> <20150622095429.01fd4b3a@cchemparathy-ubuntu> <6506395.G0ohLZsOhG@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db3on0085.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.55.234.85]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DDD3C354 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:03:54 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <6506395.G0ohLZsOhG@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:00:44 +0200 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Not sure it makes sense to have different library names. > > > Why not renaming all to "dpdk"? > > > > This config doesn't seem to be getting used anywhere. Maybe just > > get rid of it globally? > > No it's used in mk/ directory: > git grep RTE_LIBNAME Right. But if all platforms are going to be defining these to the same thing "dpdk", do we need to retain the config?