From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] kni: fix build with Linux kernel 4.1 or later Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:25:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20150710102551.4e998ab5@urahara> References: <1436463806-2729-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <9514159.N7eeHKzaoJ@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com (mail-pa0-f51.google.com [209.85.220.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F0BC406 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:25:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pactm7 with SMTP id tm7so171454471pac.2 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:25:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9514159.N7eeHKzaoJ@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:53:51 +0200 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-07-09 10:43, Stephen Hemminger: > > From: Stephen Hemminger > > > > The internal API for some functions used by KNI changes in current > > kernel. KNI really needs to be submitted upstream (by Intel) > > to keep it maintainable. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > > There was already a similar patchset from Miguel Bernal Marin waiting for review: > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/5862 > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/5863 > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/5864 Sure Intel patch is cleaner. But KNI, is heading down an #ifdef rathole.