From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethdev: fix ABI breakage in lro code
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 08:53:03 -0400
Message-ID: <20150803125303.GA13755@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
References: <1436783185-8279-1-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com>
 <55BED47A.8030001@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <55BEE3EA.90006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <7256638.4inC2JWGiy@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE43C3E4
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  3 Aug 2015 14:53:15 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7256638.4inC2JWGiy@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 10:41:47AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Chao,
> The original need was to check with the ABI checker tool that the ABI
> was not broken on POWER BE by this patch.
> 
Yes, its not compilation thats the concern, its ABI compatibility.

Neil

> 
> 2015-08-03 11:45, Chao Zhu:
> > Confirmed. It can compile on Power8 Big Endian.
> > Thank you!
> > 
> > On 2015/8/3 10:39, Chao Zhu wrote:
> > >
> > > Really sorry for the delay.
> > > Originally, I thought the email was to asking the ABI checking tools 
> > > on Power which I'm not so familiar with.  So this took me some time to 
> > > find solution. For Power little endian, the build is OK. I'll give 
> > > feedback when I tried Big  endian compilation.
> 
> [...]
> 
> > >>>>>> I presume the ABI checker stopped complaining about this with the
> > >>>>>> patch, yes?
> > >>>>> Hi Neil,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Yes, I replied about that in the previous thread.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> Thank you, I'll ack as soon as Chao confirms its not a problem on 
> > >>>> ppc Neil
> 
>