From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: Bug tracker for DPDK Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:46:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20150827104637.111e4871@urahara> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" To: "Mcnamara, John" Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com (mail-pa0-f41.google.com [209.85.220.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE64591A for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:46:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pacdd16 with SMTP id dd16so32659155pac.2 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:46:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:28:45 +0000 "Mcnamara, John" wrote: > Hi, > > Now that we are at the start of a release cycle it is a good time to talk about the need for a bug tracker for DPDK. > > As well as tracking defects it could be used to track upcoming or desired features/fixes. > > The most obvious tool for this is Bugzilla but other suggestions or ideas are welcome: > > https://www.bugzilla.org/ > > John. The problem with bug trackers is everyone has agree to use it. Which is why Linux kernel developers treat bugzilla as read-only.