From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: Regarding MMIO Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:42:28 -0700 Message-ID: <20151001074228.6c980c96@urahara> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Venkateswara Rao Dokku Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com (mail-pa0-f52.google.com [209.85.220.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4798E61 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:42:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pablk4 with SMTP id lk4so76012703pab.3 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 07:42:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:51:42 +0530 Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: > Hi, > > If we go through the DPDK code it is observed that we are using MMIO for > Virt-IO devices. But in the Virt-IO specification, it is written that from > Virt-IO 1.0 onwards only they are supporting MMIO, all previous versions > uses Port IO for RX/TX notifications. > > So, If I use VirtIO 0.9, Can I get the MMIO based notifications for RX/TX > or is it supported only for Virt-IO 1.0 onwards? > Although the virtio device will bind to the mmio address in some cases, it does not use that. It uses i/o port access (see iopl) to activate host.