From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: DPDK patch backlog
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:25:01 -0400
Message-ID: <20151016142501.GA5602@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
References: <20151015144406.1aaca698@xeon-e3>
 <3345500.oDnpnKKuHc@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239CF5A84
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:25:11 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3345500.oDnpnKKuHc@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:45:23AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-10-15 14:44, Stephen Hemminger:
> > There are currently 428 patches in New state in DPDK patchwork.
> > 
> > Thomas, could you start reducing that backlog?
> 
> Yes
> 
> > The simplest solution would be to merge some of the big patch series
> > from Intel for the base drivers, then reviewers can focus on the other
> > patches.
> 
> That's why having a drivers/net subtree would be useful.
> 

Agreed, a dpdk-next tree would really be the solution here.

Neil