From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost-user: enable virtio 1.0
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 10:04:06 +0300
Message-ID: <20151018095438-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
References: <1444907319-26348-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com>
 <20151015161150-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
 <20151016135230.GF9980@bricha3-MOBL3>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>, dev@dpdk.org
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F416C3772
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 09:04:09 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151016135230.GF9980@bricha3-MOBL3>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 02:52:30PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 04:18:59PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:08:39PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > Make vhost-user virtio 1.0 compatible by adding it to the
> > > supported features and keeping the header length
> > > the same as for mergeable RX buffers.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Looks good to me
> > 
> > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Just one question: dpdk is only supported on little-endian
> > platforms at the moment, right?
> 
> A recent release added in support for PPC (patches supplied by IBM). For 
> example, see: 
> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=704ba3770032c5a901719d3837845581d5a56b58
> 
> /Bruce

This will require more work then as 1.0 is a different
endian-ness from 0.9. It's up to you guys to decide
whether correct BE support is now a requirement for all
new dpdk code. Let us know.

-- 
MST