From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: Fix wrong handling of virtqueue array
 index
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:00:14 +0800
Message-ID: <20151027080014.GF3115@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1445932306-11880-1-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com
To: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF3D5A76
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:59:10 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1445932306-11880-1-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>


On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 04:51:46PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> The patch fixes wrong handling of virtqueue array index when
> GET_VRING_BASE message comes.
> The vhost backend will receive the message per virtqueue.
> Also we should call a destroy callback handler when both RXQ
> and TXQ receives the message.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>


Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>

Thanks.

	--yliu
> ---
>  lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/virtio-net-user.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/virtio-net-user.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/virtio-net-user.c
> index a998ad8..99c075f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/virtio-net-user.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/virtio-net-user.c
> @@ -283,12 +283,10 @@ user_get_vring_base(struct vhost_device_ctx ctx,
>  	struct vhost_vring_state *state)
>  {
>  	struct virtio_net *dev = get_device(ctx);
> +	uint16_t base_idx = state->index / VIRTIO_QNUM * VIRTIO_QNUM;
>  
>  	if (dev == NULL)
>  		return -1;
> -	/* We have to stop the queue (virtio) if it is running. */
> -	if (dev->flags & VIRTIO_DEV_RUNNING)
> -		notify_ops->destroy_device(dev);
>  
>  	/* Here we are safe to get the last used index */
>  	ops->get_vring_base(ctx, state->index, state);
> @@ -300,15 +298,17 @@ user_get_vring_base(struct vhost_device_ctx ctx,
>  	 * sent and only sent in vhost_vring_stop.
>  	 * TODO: cleanup the vring, it isn't usable since here.
>  	 */
> -	if (dev->virtqueue[state->index + VIRTIO_RXQ]->kickfd >= 0) {
> -		close(dev->virtqueue[state->index + VIRTIO_RXQ]->kickfd);
> -		dev->virtqueue[state->index + VIRTIO_RXQ]->kickfd = -1;
> -	}
> -	if (dev->virtqueue[state->index + VIRTIO_TXQ]->kickfd >= 0) {
> -		close(dev->virtqueue[state->index + VIRTIO_TXQ]->kickfd);
> -		dev->virtqueue[state->index + VIRTIO_TXQ]->kickfd = -1;
> +	if (dev->virtqueue[state->index]->kickfd >= 0) {
> +		close(dev->virtqueue[state->index]->kickfd);
> +		dev->virtqueue[state->index]->kickfd = -1;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* We have to stop the queue (virtio) if it is running. */
> +	if ((dev->flags & VIRTIO_DEV_RUNNING) &&
> +			(dev->virtqueue[base_idx + VIRTIO_RXQ]->kickfd == -1) &&
> +			(dev->virtqueue[base_idx + VIRTIO_TXQ]->kickfd == -1))
> +		notify_ops->destroy_device(dev);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.1.4