From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: Proposals from project governance meeting at DPDK Userspace (was Notes from ...) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 09:21:53 -0800 Message-ID: <20151102092153.3b005229@xeon-e3> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "CHIOSI, MARGARET T \(mc3124@att.com\)" , "Pradeep Kathail \(pkathail@cisco.com\)" To: Bagh Fares Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com [209.85.220.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8D95A50 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:21:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by pasz6 with SMTP id z6so154221474pas.2 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:21:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" There were two outcomes. One was a proposal to move governance under Linux Foundation. The other was to have a technical steering committee. It was agreed the TSC would be based on the contributors to the project, although we didn't come to a conclusion on a voting model. I would propose that TSC should be elected at regular user summit from nominees; in a manner similar to LF Technical Advisory Board.