From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: Architecture Board Proposal Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 09:50:11 -0800 Message-ID: <20151102095011.26c8f978@xeon-e3> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674488A2@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com (mail-pa0-f50.google.com [209.85.220.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39A78DA1 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:50:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by pasz6 with SMTP id z6so154839204pas.2 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:50:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674488A2@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:21:48 +0000 "O'Driscoll, Tim" wrote: > At the recent DPDK Userspace event we agreed that we need a body to make technical decisions for the project. In Dublin we referred to this as a Technical Steering Committee, but that term is often used on other projects to describe a body with a more political charter. To avoid confusion, and clarify that the scope of this body for DPDK is purely technical, I propose calling it the DPDK Architecture Board. Great idea. I like good names.