From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] virtio/lib:add vhost TX checksum support capabilities Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:31:14 -0800 Message-ID: <20151111093114.46bb40ee@xeon-e3> References: <1447224046-1169-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> <1447224046-1169-4-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> <20151111082657.GZ2326@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Yuanhan Liu Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518398E67 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:31:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by pacdm15 with SMTP id dm15so36401100pac.3 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:31:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151111082657.GZ2326@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:26:57 +0800 Yuanhan Liu wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:40:41PM +0800, Jijiang Liu wrote: > > Add vhost TX offload(CSUM and TSO) support capabilities. > > Claiming first that we support something, and then actually implementing > in a later patch is wrong, as at this stage, we actually does not support > that, hence, the functionality is broken. > > --yliu Actually in this case it is okay to claim that driver "might" use offload cabability but never do it. But agree in general better to keep both together.