From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuanhan Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] virtio/lib:add vhost TX checksum support capabilities Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 09:41:49 +0800 Message-ID: <20151112014149.GE2326@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1447224046-1169-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> <1447224046-1169-4-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> <20151111082657.GZ2326@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <20151111093114.46bb40ee@xeon-e3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946268E84 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 02:37:49 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151111093114.46bb40ee@xeon-e3> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:31:14AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:26:57 +0800 > Yuanhan Liu wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:40:41PM +0800, Jijiang Liu wrote: > > > Add vhost TX offload(CSUM and TSO) support capabilities. > > > > Claiming first that we support something, and then actually implementing > > in a later patch is wrong, as at this stage, we actually does not support > > that, hence, the functionality is broken. > > > > --yliu > > Actually in this case it is okay to claim that driver "might" use offload > cabability but never do it. But it will not work once it does use it, right? --yliu > But agree in general better to keep both together.