From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemming@brocade.com>
Subject: Re: Coverity policy for upstream (base) drivers.
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:38:22 -0800
Message-ID: <20151113113822.1541d4dd@xeon-e3>
References: <20151112140508.79489210@xeon-e3>
 <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2023BAF1C@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <20151113184911.GA25051@mhcomputing.net>
 <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2023BBD21@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
To: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com (mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com
 [67.231.144.122]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174A2C3A0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 20:38:14 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2023BBD21@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:21:24 +0000
"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Matthew Hall [mailto:mhall@mhcomputing.net]
> > Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 6:49 PM
> > To: Mcnamara, John
> > Cc: Stephen Hemminger; Thomas Monjalon; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Coverity policy for upstream (base) drivers.
> > 
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:12:04AM +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > > If people haven't already done so I would urge them to sign up and
> > view/fix the defects.
> > >
> > >     https://scan.coverity.com/users/sign_up
> > >     https://scan.coverity.com/projects/4005 (DPDK)
> > 
> > Hi John,
> > 
> > I got signed up. Thanks for spearheading this.
> > 
> > From past experience squashing SA defects on my own code and several
> > previous employers I would like to recommend we band together and
> > configure a SonarQube instance.
> 
> Hi Matthew,
> 
> I definitely be interested in getting SonarQube working with DPDK. We can sync up on this as soon as the 2.2 bush fires die down.
> 
> John.

It looked like SonarQube was both non-free for doing any real scans,
and the default C rules were oriented towards a completely different
Windows oriented coding style.