From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] lib/librte_eal: Remove unnecessary hugepage zero-filling Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:09:06 -0800 Message-ID: <20151118110906.3e0b3dcd@samsung9> References: <1447817231-10510-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> <1447817231-10510-3-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE094183467C@SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20151118080013.3cad8f5b@samsung9> <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B035985B24@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" To: "Richardson, Bruce" Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com [209.85.220.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94965AA0 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 20:09:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by pacdm15 with SMTP id dm15so53438815pac.3 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:09:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B035985B24@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:13:32 +0000 "Richardson, Bruce" wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger > > Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 4:00 PM > > To: Xie, Huawei > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/2] lib/librte_eal: Remove unnecessary > > hugepage zero-filling > > > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:07:54 +0000 > > "Xie, Huawei" wrote: > > > > > >>> The kernel fills new allocated (huge) pages with zeros. > > > >>> DPDK just has to touch the pages to trigger the allocation. > > > I think we shouldn't reply on the assumption that kernel has zeroed > > > the memory. Kernel zeroes the memory mostly to avoid information > > > leakage.It could also achieve this by setting each bit to 1. > > > What we indeed need to check is later DPDK initialization code doesn't > > > assume the memory has been zeroed. Otherwise zero only that part of > > > the memory. Does this makes sense? > > > > If all new pages are zero, why does DPDK have to pre-touch the pages at > > all? > > The pages won't actually be mapped into the processes address space until accessed. > > /Bruce Isn't that what mmap MAP_POPULATE flag (not currently used) will do.