From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] lib/librte_eal: Remove unnecessary hugepage zero-filling Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:15:43 +0000 Message-ID: <20151120121543.GA2528@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1447817231-10510-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> <1447817231-10510-3-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE094183467C@SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20151118080013.3cad8f5b@samsung9> <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B035985B24@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> <20151118110906.3e0b3dcd@samsung9> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2EE5A6C for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:15:47 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151118110906.3e0b3dcd@samsung9> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:09:06AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:13:32 +0000 > "Richardson, Bruce" wrote: > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 4:00 PM > > > To: Xie, Huawei > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/2] lib/librte_eal: Remove unnecessary > > > hugepage zero-filling > > > > > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:07:54 +0000 > > > "Xie, Huawei" wrote: > > > > > > > >>> The kernel fills new allocated (huge) pages with zeros. > > > > >>> DPDK just has to touch the pages to trigger the allocation. > > > > I think we shouldn't reply on the assumption that kernel has zeroed > > > > the memory. Kernel zeroes the memory mostly to avoid information > > > > leakage.It could also achieve this by setting each bit to 1. > > > > What we indeed need to check is later DPDK initialization code doesn't > > > > assume the memory has been zeroed. Otherwise zero only that part of > > > > the memory. Does this makes sense? > > > > > > If all new pages are zero, why does DPDK have to pre-touch the pages at > > > all? > > > > The pages won't actually be mapped into the processes address space until accessed. > > > > /Bruce > > Isn't that what mmap MAP_POPULATE flag (not currently used) will do. Hadn't seen that flag before, but it does indeed look to do exactly what we want. /Bruce