From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Subject: Re: difficulty w/ RTE_NEXT_ABI
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 22:53:13 -0500
Message-ID: <20151123035313.GA31612@mhcomputing.net>
References: <20151121084935.GA24056@mhcomputing.net> <2764108.ZoWOrsZgTX@xps13>
 <20151122232509.GA27730@mhcomputing.net> <1629381.JoeoXysOOK@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9058DAC
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 04:53:13 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1629381.JoeoXysOOK@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 01:13:32AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> If your change is sent upstream, you must rely on the new ABI because the old one
> will be removed when your change will be integrated.
> If it is a local change, it depends on which ABI you want to use.

I submitted separately to Bruce & Co. It is for LPM field expansion.

My question what to do came up in the context of a rebase to master.

> Yes. Hope my detailed answer is enough.

Thanks. It is less confusing now.

Matthew.