From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Horman Subject: Re: 2.3 Roadmap Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 06:24:28 -0500 Message-ID: <20151202112428.GA22216@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674705F1@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <20151130171655.70e4ce25@xeon-e3> <20151201100333.GA32252@bricha3-MOBL3> <565DAE6E.5040102@redhat.com> <565DB356.9060602@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" To: Vincent JARDIN Return-path: Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19DF8D86 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:24:41 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <565DB356.9060602@6wind.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:48:54PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote: > On 01/12/2015 15:27, Panu Matilainen wrote: > >The problem with that (unless I'm missing something here) is that KNI > >requires using out-of-tree kernel modules which makes it pretty much a > >non-option for distros. > > It works fine with some distros. I do not think it should be an argument. > Strictly speaking it _works_ fine with all distros. The problem is that some choose not to use out of tree modules, and that will limit dpdk's reach. which is not what you want. Neil