From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] doc: correct Vhost Sample Application
 guide
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:40:46 +0800
Message-ID: <20151210064046.GS29571@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1449664541-9546-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
 <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2023FFEB4@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <3756278.RbTW4O93Bj@xps13>
 <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C219F8E971@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
To: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5635A8D96
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 07:39:28 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C219F8E971@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 04:14:01PM +0000, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
> Hi John,
> <snip>
> 
> > 2015-12-09 14:50, Mcnamara, John:
> > > Also, as a general note, not just to this document/patch.
> > >
> > > I don't think the "user@target:~$" prefixes used in some DPDK Doc
> > > commandlines is useful.
> > >
> > > It prevents a straight copy and paste for testing, it makes the
> > > literal block lines longer than they should be, it isn't used
> > > consistently everywhere, it is visually distracting (in some cases it
> > > is longer than the command being shown), and it isn't always correct
> > > (I presume in the above case of "user@target" you would need run the
> > > application as sudo if you are a non root user).
> > >
> > > Any objections to removing these as documents are updated?
> > 
> > Generally speaking, +1 to remove extra bytes :)
> 
> I will remove the "user@target:~$"  prefixes in this document.

I'd personally suggest to keep the "$ " prefix, or "# " if it needs
root privilege. Which is a convention to paste commands.

	--yliu