From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal: map io resources for non x86
	architectures
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 21:42:00 +0800
Message-ID: <20151216134200.GA724@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <CAAyOgsaMO7V1K8Yxh=Zf-E4iodDevMFG+rRBPgZXBysca9JopA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1450269064-23608-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com>
 <20151216124834.GR29571@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <CALwxeUuBmTwupeagPApcaDTNYrNTiKrPgA+TYRJgNHb25Ock0A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D820ADE6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:41:47 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALwxeUuBmTwupeagPApcaDTNYrNTiKrPgA+TYRJgNHb25Ock0A@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 02:34:35PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> Yuanhan,
> 
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
> wrote:
> 
>     On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:31:04PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
>     > x86 requires a special set of instructions to access ioports, but other
>     > architectures let you remap io resources.
>     > So let eal remap io resources by accepting IORESOURCE_IO flag for
>     > architectures other than x86.
> 
>     One question: this patch could be a replacement of the igbuio_iomap patch
>     from Santosh? If so, I like it: It's more elegant.
> 
> 
> Well, yes, unless I missed something since I am no guru :-).

Great then. If there is a test-by, I could give my Ack :)
(I have no arm or other platform for testing).

	--yliu