From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] virtio support for container
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:14:34 +0800
Message-ID: <20160112061434.GL26062@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1446748276-132087-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <1452426182-86851-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <569490D9.10803@igel.co.jp> <5694934B.5070900@intel.com>
 <5694969D.3040008@igel.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: nakajima.yoshihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp, mst@redhat.com, dev@dpdk.org,
 ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com
To: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>,
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
 "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>, "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB958D93
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:13:41 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5694969D.3040008@igel.co.jp>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:01:01PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2016/01/12 14:46, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tetsuya,
> >  
> >
> >> Hi Jianfeng and Xie,
> >>
> >> I guess my implementation and yours have a lot of common code, so I will
> >> try to rebase my patch on yours.
> >
> > We also think so. And before you rebase your code, I think we can rely
> > on Yuanhan's
> > struct virtio_pci_ops to make the code structure brief and clear, as
> > discussed in your
> > patch's thread, i.e., we both rebase our code according to Yuanhan's
> > code. Is that OK?
> >
> 
> Yes, I agree with it.

I will send v2 out today, and hopefully someone will ACK and test it
soon.  After that, I'm also hoping Thomas could do a quick merge then.

	--yliu