From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] virtio support for container
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:29:54 +0800
Message-ID: <20160112062954.GM26062@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1446748276-132087-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <1452426182-86851-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <569490D9.10803@igel.co.jp> <5694934B.5070900@intel.com>
 <5694969D.3040008@igel.co.jp>
 <20160112061434.GL26062@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <56949CA7.50003@igel.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: nakajima.yoshihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp, mst@redhat.com, dev@dpdk.org,
 ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com
To: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1B02EDA
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:29:01 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56949CA7.50003@igel.co.jp>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:26:47PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2016/01/12 15:14, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:01:01PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> >> On 2016/01/12 14:46, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> >>> Hi Tetsuya,
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Jianfeng and Xie,
> >>>>
> >>>> I guess my implementation and yours have a lot of common code, so I will
> >>>> try to rebase my patch on yours.
> >>> We also think so. And before you rebase your code, I think we can rely
> >>> on Yuanhan's
> >>> struct virtio_pci_ops to make the code structure brief and clear, as
> >>> discussed in your
> >>> patch's thread, i.e., we both rebase our code according to Yuanhan's
> >>> code. Is that OK?
> >>>
> >> Yes, I agree with it.
> > I will send v2 out today, and hopefully someone will ACK and test it
> > soon.  After that, I'm also hoping Thomas could do a quick merge then.
> >
> > 	--yliu
> >
> 
> Hi Yuanhan,
> 
> Thanks, I will review and test it also.

Appreciate that!

	--yliu