From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: coding style: use linux kernel style
 for indentation
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:49:59 -0800
Message-ID: <20160113084959.797beea5@xeon-e3>
References: <1452671929-29617-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <20160113150708.GD7756@bricha3-MOBL3>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-pf0-f178.google.com (mail-pf0-f178.google.com
 [209.85.192.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6497A6A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:49:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pf0-f178.google.com with SMTP id e65so84167126pfe.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:49:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20160113150708.GD7756@bricha3-MOBL3>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:07:08 +0000
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:

> So, while the two-tab indent may look "a bit weird" it does solve the two issues
> above. I believe practical benefits should override initial impressions. [It took
> me a while to get used to also, but now I very much like it as a style.]

I don't think that deviating from kernel style for this case is justified.