From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] Use common Linux tools to control DPDK ports Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:12:30 -0800 Message-ID: <20160118151230.194a95c6@xeon-e3> References: <1452874684-12750-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Ferruh Yigit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com [209.85.220.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756638E59 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:16:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id ho8so179788172pac.2 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:16:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1452874684-12750-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:18:01 +0000 Ferruh Yigit wrote: > This work is to make DPDK ports more visible and to enable using common > Linux tools to configure DPDK ports. > > Patch is based on KNI but contains only control functionality of it, > also this patch does not include any Linux kernel network driver as > part of it. I actually would like KNI to die and be replaced by something generic. Right now with KNI it is driver and hardware specific. It is almost as if there are three drivers for ixgbe, the Linux driver, the DPDK driver, and the KNI driver.