From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] virtio: add 1.0 support
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 15:54:32 +0800
Message-ID: <20160119075432.GJ19531@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1452581944-24838-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <1452832571-6156-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <1452832571-6156-8-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C5A0D87@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <20160119055513.GI19531@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C5A3A8C@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
To: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9388D96
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 08:52:24 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C5A3A8C@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 07:44:04AM +0000, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 1/19/2016 1:53 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 04:50:16PM +0000, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> >> On 1/15/2016 12:34 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> >>> -static void
> >>> +static int
> >>>  virtio_negotiate_features(struct virtio_hw *hw)
> >>>  {
> >>>  	uint64_t host_features;
> >>> @@ -949,6 +949,22 @@ virtio_negotiate_features(struct virtio_hw *hw)
> >>>  	hw->guest_features = vtpci_negotiate_features(hw, host_features);
> >> Here if we are not modern device, we should remove VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 in
> >> guest features.
> > VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 should not be set for legacy virtio device at all.
> 
> Yes, but here this patch sets this VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 feature even for
> legacy virtio device.
> It doesn't cause issues, but better remove it for legacy virtio device.

It's not set for legacy virtio device (at hw->guest_features), how could
you remove it then???

	--yliu