From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuanhan Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] vhost: refactor rte_vhost_dequeue_burst Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:26:15 +0800 Message-ID: <20160127032615.GC4257@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1449122773-25510-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> <1449122773-25510-2-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Victor Kaplansky , "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: "Xie, Huawei" Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5768893CC for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 04:25:53 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:30:12AM +0000, Xie, Huawei wrote: > On 12/3/2015 2:03 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu > > --- > > lib/librte_vhost/vhost_rxtx.c | 287 +++++++++++++++++------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 174 deletions(-) > > Prefer to unroll copy_mbuf_to_desc and your COPY macro. It prevents us I'm okay to unroll COPY macro. But for copy_mbuf_to_desc, I prefer not to do that, unless it has a good reason. > processing descriptors in a burst way in future. So, do you have a plan? --yliu