From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Yigit, Ferruh" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rte_ctrl_if: add control interface library Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 14:22:04 +0000 Message-ID: <20160128142204.GA880@sivlogin002.ir.intel.com> References: <1453911849-16562-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <1453911849-16562-3-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <56A9F827.1060403@intel.com> <20160128131500.GA16492@sivlogin002.ir.intel.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836AFFCC8@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0CAC47E for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 15:23:50 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836AFFCC8@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 01:57:04PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > Hi Ferruh, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit > > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 1:15 PM > > To: Horton, Remy > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] rte_ctrl_if: add control interface library > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:14:47AM +0000, Remy Horton wrote: > > > On 27/01/2016 16:24, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > > > > > > + default: > > > > + ret = -95 /* EOPNOTSUPP */; > > > > + break; > > > > > > Is this intentional? -EOPNOTSUPP is -122 (-95 is -ENOTSOCK).. > > > > > Return value is not significant, callee just checks for negative value, > > I can remove comment to prevent confusion. > > Please use values defined in errno.h, there are plenty of them, > no need to invent your own error codes. OK > Also pls don't forget to address all comments I gave you offline. Yes, I also remember your comment when I saw this J, it seems this one missed. I will address in next revision. Thanks, ferruh