From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Hall Subject: Re: lpm patches Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:21:21 -0800 Message-ID: <20160201212121.GA17493@mhcomputing.net> References: <20151030120018.GA4904@bricha3-MOBL3> <20151030175927.GA21104@mhcomputing.net> <20151030215516.GA12128@bricha3-MOBL3> <20151030222524.GA23508@mhcomputing.net> <56AEAC11.602@gandi.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Nikita Kozlov Return-path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19DE8D94 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 22:21:22 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56AEAC11.602@gandi.net> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:51:29AM +0100, Nikita Kozlov wrote: > Hello, > I wanted to know if there was something new or if I can help on this topic ? > I'm using rte_lpm in a project so I may (at least) do some tests or reviews. If you search the archive of the list some patch came out recently which is some help. But sadly won't help much for me as it is IPv4 only so I'll be sticking with my existing set that does IPv4 and IPv6. Matthew.