From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH] i40e: fix the issue of port initialization failure Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 16:31:12 +0000 Message-ID: <20160203163112.GA2528@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1450848779-8183-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Helin Zhang Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE455A06 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 17:31:17 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1450848779-8183-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 01:32:59PM +0800, Helin Zhang wrote: > Workaround for the issue of cannot processing adminq commands during > initialization, when 2x40G or 4x10G is receiving packets in highest > throughput. Register 0x002698a8 and 0x002698ac should be cleared at > first, and restored with the default values at the end. No more > details, as they are not exposed registers. > > Signed-off-by: Helin Zhang Hi Helin, can you please add an appropriately "fixes" line to the patch, since the subject explicitly calls it out as a bug-fix. Also, the words "the issue" in the subject can be removed as they don't add value. It would also be worthwhile referencing the adminq in the subject too, since that is the failure being reported. How about: "i40e: fix adminq failure on port init" Regards, /Bruce