From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Hall Subject: Re: thoughts on DPDK after a few days of reading sources Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:41:19 -0800 Message-ID: <20160211034119.GA10314@mhcomputing.net> References: <20160211030540.GB25680@hunt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Seth Arnold Return-path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072A011D9 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 04:41:20 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160211030540.GB25680@hunt> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:05:40PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote: > - ixgbe driver in the package is very different from the driver in the > Linux kernel -- when bugs in one are found, who is in charge of copying > the fixes between the two code bases? It's not the Linux driver. It's from BSD because DPDK uses mbufs. The MAINTAINERS file / Intel team refreshes it w/ shared code from their upstream BSD support. Matthew.