From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuanhan Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 for 2.3] vhost rxtx refactor Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:09:13 +0800 Message-ID: <20160218040913.GM21426@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1449122773-25510-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> <111992201.GYQ3cgQmjX@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Victor Kaplansky , "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60032C1C0 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:08:50 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <111992201.GYQ3cgQmjX@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:50:22PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi Yuanhan, > > 2015-12-03 14:06, Yuanhan Liu: > > Vhost rxtx code is derived from vhost-switch example, which is very > > likely the most messy code in DPDK. Unluckily, the move also brings > > over the bad merits: twisted logic, bad comments. > > > > When I joined this team firstly, I was quite scared off by the messy > > and long vhost rxtx code. While adding the vhost-user live migration > > support, that I have to make fews changes to it, I then ventured to > > look at it again, to understand it better, in the meantime, to see if > > I can refactor it. > > > > And, here you go. > > There were several comments and a typo detected. > Please what is the status of this patchset? Hi Thomas, It was delayed; and I will address those comments and send out a new version recently. --yliu