From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] vhost-user live migration support
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 22:24:16 +0800
Message-ID: <20160222142416.GZ21426@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1450321921-27799-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <2602035.hWpncUurjs@xps13>
 <20160222070824.GY21426@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <1606367.cIK8dmaxrY@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Victor Kaplansky <vkaplans@redhat.com>,
 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3452C0B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:23:07 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1606367.cIK8dmaxrY@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:56:42AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Patches 2 and 3 have been merged to avoid a compilation error.
> > > Applied, thanks
> > 
> > Actually, there was a ongoing discussion about patch 6, the handling
> > of VHOST_USER_SEND_RARP request:
> > 
> >   http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-February/033539.html
> > 
> > Maybe you have seen that and I didn't make it clear; my bad. Since you
> > have already applied it. I will make a standalone patch, and try to
> > send it out today.
> 
> Yes I've wrongly understood there was no problem.
> The series would have not been applied if you had said that a new version
> was needed or if you had set the patchwork status to "Changes Requested".

Yeah, that's my bad. I meant to send it out soon, say, last Friday
night. However, I didn't make it. For the patchwork stuff, I'm
still gettig used to it. So, thanks for the tip. I will bear that
in mind next time.

> Sorry, we'll do better next times ;)

Yeah :)

A new patch will be sent out soon. Please consider to apply it. Or,
maybe we can hold it for a while, to see if someone else have comments.
I will ping you to apply it next week if no comments.

Thanks.

	--yliu