From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal: add missing long-options for short option arguments Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 21:32:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20160225213203.GB14936@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1456427356-67147-1-git-send-email-keith.wiles@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Keith Wiles Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1F92BCE for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:32:07 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1456427356-67147-1-git-send-email-keith.wiles@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 01:09:16PM -0600, Keith Wiles wrote: > A number of short options for EAL are missing long options > and this patch adds those missing options. > > The missing long options are for: > -c add --coremask > -d add --driver > -l add --corelist > -m add --memsize > -n add --mem-channels > -r add --mem-ranks > -v add --version > Add an alias for --lcores using --lcore-map > > Signed-off-by: Keith Wiles Why do we need long options for all the short options? /Bruce