From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuanhan Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] virtio vector and misc Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 16:32:25 +0800 Message-ID: <20160302083225.GR14300@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1456750690-3210-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> <1456826540-15990-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Santosh Shukla Return-path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6E995FD for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 09:31:09 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1456826540-15990-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:32:17PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote: > - 1st patch: let non-x86 arch use virtio pmd driver in non-vec > - 2nd patch: enable virtio arm support > - 3rd patch: update virtio for arm feature entry in release guide. Series looks good to me: Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu However, FYI, Thomas would like to see that the release note is added __inside__ the patch that acutally enables it, but not in another standalone patch. In another word, you should squash patch 3 to patch 2. I'm wondering Thomas could do that for you this time while applying your pathces. But, this is just a kind remind, and you should not do that next time. --yliu