From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcap: fix captured frame length
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 18:42:31 +0000
Message-ID: <20160309184231.GA8020@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <1453979390-36685-1-git-send-email-dror.birkman@lightcyber.com>
 <56AA5A95.7000400@emutex.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Nicolas Pernas Maradei <nicolas.pernas.maradei@emutex.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEF42C5D
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  9 Mar 2016 19:42:34 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56AA5A95.7000400@emutex.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 06:14:45PM +0000, Nicolas Pernas Maradei wrote:
> Hi Dror,
> 
> Good catch. What you are saying makes sense and it is also explained in
> pcap's documentation. Was your setup unusual though?
> This might sound like a silly question but I don't remember seeing that
> issue and I should have since your fix is correct.
> 
> Nico.
> 
Applied to dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04

/Bruce