From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal_interrupts.c: properly init struct epoll_event (valgrind) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:19:24 -0700 Message-ID: <20160317101924.16f7bf45@samsung9> References: <1455345678-17662-1-git-send-email-mhall@mhcomputing.net> <20160214122209.38b0efb6@xeon-e3> <1663421.MSGVGpLJHn@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Matthew Hall To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com (mail-oi0-f49.google.com [209.85.218.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27988567F for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:19:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oi0-f49.google.com with SMTP id r187so68977126oih.3 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:19:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1663421.MSGVGpLJHn@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:18:15 +0100 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Please, could you turn it into a real patch with your sign-off? > Thanks > > 2016-02-14 12:22, Stephen Hemminger: > > A better patch would be to move the data structure into the > > code block used, and get rid of the useless else (rte_panic never returns); > > and fix the indentation, and use C99 initialization which should make valgrind > > happier. > > > > The moral is don't just slap memsets around > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c > > index 06b26a9..d53826e 100644 > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c > > @@ -799,8 +799,6 @@ eal_intr_handle_interrupts(int pfd, unsigned totalfds) > > static __attribute__((noreturn)) void * > > eal_intr_thread_main(__rte_unused void *arg) > > { > > - struct epoll_event ev; > > - > > /* host thread, never break out */ > > for (;;) { > > /* build up the epoll fd with all descriptors we are to > > @@ -834,20 +832,22 @@ eal_intr_thread_main(__rte_unused void *arg) > > TAILQ_FOREACH(src, &intr_sources, next) { > > if (src->callbacks.tqh_first == NULL) > > continue; /* skip those with no callbacks */ > > - ev.events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLPRI; > > - ev.data.fd = src->intr_handle.fd; > > + > > + struct epoll_event ev = { > > + .events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLPRI, > > + .data.fd = src->intr_handle.fd, > > + }; > > > > /** > > * add all the uio device file descriptor > > * into wait list. > > */ > > if (epoll_ctl(pfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, > > - src->intr_handle.fd, &ev) < 0){ > > + src->intr_handle.fd, &ev) < 0) > > rte_panic("Error adding fd %d epoll_ctl, %s\n", > > src->intr_handle.fd, strerror(errno)); > > - } > > - else > > - numfds++; > > + > > + numfds++; > > } > > rte_spinlock_unlock(&intr_lock); > > /* serve the interrupt */ > > Sure I thought Matthew would since he reported the issue and had the ability to test it.