From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mbuf: Add rte_pktmbuf_copy Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:40:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20160318104027.17640bed@xeon-e3> References: <1436485068-30609-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <1436485068-30609-2-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <7ADD74816B4C8A45B56203CBA65FE5A63346A5A4@IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com> <20160122093345.370f8660@xeon-e3> <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831FFDC609@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Mrzyglod, DanielX T" , "dev@dpdk.org" , Mike Davison , Stephen Hemminger To: "Pattan, Reshma" Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f172.google.com (mail-pf0-f172.google.com [209.85.192.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C01D5586 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:40:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pf0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n5so176708555pfn.2 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:40:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831FFDC609@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:03:51 +0000 "Pattan, Reshma" wrote: > Hi, > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen > > > >Hemminger > > > >Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 1:38 AM > > > >To: dev@dpdk.org > > > >Cc: Mike Davison ; Stephen Hemminger > > > > > > > >Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mbuf: Add rte_pktmbuf_copy > > > > > > > >From: Stephen Hemminger > > > > > > > >Added rte_pktmbuf_copy() function since copying multi-part segments > > > >is common issue and can be problematic. > > > > > > > >Signed-off-by: Mike Davison > > > >Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger > > > >--- > > > > > > Hi Stephen :> > > > This patch look useful in case of backup buffs. > > > There will be second approach ? > > > > I did bother resubmitting it since unless there are users in current code base it > > would likely rot. > > I was writing similar mbuf copy functionality which is required for tcpdump feature. > But, It was brought to my notice that this patch with similar functionality already exists, so I would like to take this patch and work on further. > Also, if you have any further code changes on this patch, would you please send the latest one. I will work further. > > Thanks, > Reshma We have a newer version that handles different size pools.