From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/2] vhost: Add VHOST PMD
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:13:06 +0000
Message-ID: <20160318141306.GB12932@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <1457316434-19128-3-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
 <20160318122702.GA12932@bricha3-MOBL3>
 <CAKU8wkfGvO2VObx70-S0nz38jqCkzCDHt2jkuinFbF=CgYhtzA@mail.gmail.com>
 <2019937.rZsZyTZeYO@xps13> <56EC0ACC.6040806@igel.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 Zhuangyanying <ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com>
To: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC45E2C06
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:13:10 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56EC0ACC.6040806@igel.co.jp>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:03:56PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2016/03/18 22:52, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-03-18 22:41, Tetsuya Mukawa:
> >> 2016/03/18 =E5=8D=88=E5=BE=8C9:27 "Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richards=
on@intel.com>:
> >>> I hope to get this set merged for RC2 very soon. Can you provide an
> >>> update for the nic overview.rst doc listing out the features of
> >>> this new PMD.
> > [...]
> >> I've sent the v12 patch with vhost.rst.
> >> Could you please check below?
> > Bruce is talking about the table of features in overview.rst.
>=20
> Hi Bruce and Thomas,
>=20
> Thanks, I've got it.
> Now I am out of office, so I will send the patch separately by hopefull=
y
> tomorrow.
> Could you please apply it separately?
>=20
I'll hold applying the patchset until I have all relevant bits ready to g=
o together.
If it's in by Monday, it should be ok. Please also supply a more detailed=
 comment
for the new flag addition that Thomas has called out on patch 1. That nee=
ds to be
resolved too before apply.

/Bruce