From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] testpmd: fix build on FreeBSD Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:15:13 +0000 Message-ID: <20160325121513.GC18028@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1458524684-13539-1-git-send-email-yong.liu@intel.com> <1458629413-24771-1-git-send-email-yong.liu@intel.com> <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8DDB9F2@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <2055843.IvPtHn5Ksq@xps13> <20160325121040.GB18028@bricha3-MOBL3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Wu, Jingjing" , "Liu, Yong" , dev@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449D229C7 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:15:17 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160325121040.GB18028@bricha3-MOBL3> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 12:10:40PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 04:17:12PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2016-03-23 02:17, Wu, Jingjing: > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Marvin Liu > > > > Build log: > > > > /root/dpdk/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c:6687:45: error: no member named > > > > 's6_addr32' in 'struct in6_addr' > > > > rte_be_to_cpu_32(res->ip_value.addr.ipv6.s6_addr32[i]); > > > > > > > > This is caused by macro "s6_addr32" not defined on FreeBSD and testpmd > > > > swap big endian parameter to host endian. Move the swap action to i40e > > > > ethdev will fix this issue. > > > > > > > > Fixes: 7b1312891b69 ("ethdev: add IP in GRE tunnel") > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu > > > Acked-by: Jingjing Wu > > > > It looks good but something is missing to decide that it is the right fix: > > the API do not state wether these fields (and others) are big endian or > > something else. > > > > Please Jingjing, fix the ethdev comments for these fields and others > > rte_eth_ipv*_flow in a separate patch. > > +1 to the more info because the endianness is confusing here. However, this look > a better fix than the previous one (v1 patch). > > Thomas, can this be merged for RC2 to fix the BSD build, which should be a > priority? Even if it's not the full solution, I think we need to at least get > the code building on BSD. > > Thanks, > /Bruce And I confirm this patch fixes the FreeBSD compile for both gcc and clang. Tested-by: Bruce Richardson