From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] qede: Add core driver Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:45:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20160330094537.024bed45@xeon-e3> References: <1459315705-25001-1-git-send-email-rasesh.mody@qlogic.com> <1459315705-25001-6-git-send-email-rasesh.mody@qlogic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , , To: Rasesh Mody Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com (mail-pa0-f41.google.com [209.85.220.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F9A12A8 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:45:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id zm5so45161046pac.0 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:45:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1459315705-25001-6-git-send-email-rasesh.mody@qlogic.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 22:28:20 -0700 Rasesh Mody wrote: > +static void > +qede_alloc_etherdev(struct qede_dev *qdev, struct qed_dev_eth_info *info) > +{ > + rte_memcpy(&qdev->dev_info, info, sizeof(*info)); Why bother with rte_memcpy here? why not just assignment or memcpy()? > + qdev->num_tc = qdev->dev_info.num_tc; > + qdev->ops = qed_ops; > +}