From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: call
 rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification only on enabled queues
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:14:58 +0800
Message-ID: <20160408061458.GF3080@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1459988946-5956-1-git-send-email-rich.lane@bigswitch.com>
 <20160407154235.GD3080@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <6607494.IC538dk6LI@xps13> <57070D3D.2070700@igel.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
 Rich Lane <rich.lane@bigswitch.com>, dev@dpdk.org
To: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903AD2C08
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  8 Apr 2016 08:13:04 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <57070D3D.2070700@igel.co.jp>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 10:45:33AM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2016/04/08 2:20, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> If the vhost PMD were configured with more queues than the guest, the old
> >>> code would segfault in rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification due to a NULL
> >>> virtqueue pointer.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: ee584e9710b9 ("vhost: add driver on top of the library")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Rich Lane <rich.lane@bigswitch.com>
> >> Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
> > Applied, thanks
> 
> Hi Rich and Yuanhan,
> 
> I am sorry for late reply. I was out of office yesterday.

Tetsuya, no worry! Man takes leaves, and isn't the reason we have 2 or
more maintainers on some blocks? :)

	--yliu

> I've tested it also today, and seems to be good.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tetsuya