From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] performance utility in testpmd
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:00:18 +0100
Message-ID: <20160421110018.GB11224@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <1461192195-104070-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com>
 <1946900.ocWSxO32dE@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Zhihong Wang <zhihong.wang@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8639E7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 13:00:22 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1946900.ocWSxO32dE@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:54:12AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-04-20 18:43, Zhihong Wang:
> > This RFC patch proposes a general purpose forwarding engine in testpmd
> > namely "portfwd", to enable performance analysis and tuning for poll mode
> > drivers in vSwitching scenarios.
> > 
> > 
> > Problem statement
> > -----------------
> > 
> > vSwitching is more I/O bound in a lot of cases since there are a lot of
> > LLC/cross-core memory accesses.
> > 
> > In order to reveal memory/cache behavior in real usage scenarios and enable
> > efficient performance analysis and tuning for vSwitching, DPDK needs a
> > sample application that supports traffic flow close to real deployment,
> > e.g. multi-tenancy, service chaining.
> > 
> > There is a vhost sample application currently to enable simple vSwitching
> > scenarios, it comes with several limitations:
> > 
> >    1) Traffic flow is too simple and not flexible
> > 
> >    2) Switching based on MAC/VLAN only
> > 
> >    3) Not enough performance metrics
> > 
> > 
> > Proposed solution
> > -----------------
> > 
> > The testpmd sample application is a good choice, it's a powerful poll mode
> > driver management framework hosts various forwarding engine.
> 
> Not sure it is a good choice.
> The goal of testpmd is to test every PMD features.
> How far can we go in adding some stack processing while keeping it
> easily maintainable?

I was thinking the exact same thing. Would it not be better to enhance the
existing vhost example application to remove the limitations you call out above?
I don't particularly like the idea of introducing protocol awareness into testpmd
for IP forwarding, for instance.

	Regards,
	/Bruce