From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Memory leak when adding/removing vhost_user ports
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:56:54 -0700
Message-ID: <20160421165654.GB11584@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <CAATJJ0JLd9iqNBvD=kyfpzk5DjGF_pGz+hBNeionZpuctNBymQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5718B306.5070801@samsung.com>
 <CAATJJ0LgZP_6=0X=WRbSOEueSuu4uCpU1n8bVcuxMwtSsPQ_nw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
 Daniele Di Proietto <diproiettod@vmware.com>,
 "dev@openvswitch.org" <dev@openvswitch.org>,
 Dyasly Sergey <s.dyasly@samsung.com>
To: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B8A3B5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:55:28 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAATJJ0LgZP_6=0X=WRbSOEueSuu4uCpU1n8bVcuxMwtSsPQ_nw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 04:04:03PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> Thanks Ilya,
> yeah we usually wait for the point releases as they undergo some extra =
testing
> and verification.
> .1 shouldn't be too much into the future I guess.
> Thanks a lot for identifying.
>=20
> That said, I'd still go on with Yuanhan to finalize the dpdk side leak =
fix we
> identified, so we eventually get it committed.
> So Yuanhan, what do you think of my last revised version of your patch =
for
> upstream DPDK (there with the=A0vhost_destroy_device then)?

That's good.

> I mean it is essentially your patch plus a bit of polishing, not mine s=
o I
> don't feel entitled to submit it as mine :-)

Thanks. I will make and send out a formal patch later.

	--yliu