From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] bonding: replace spinlock with read/write lock Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 10:12:33 -0700 Message-ID: <20160505101233.191151ac@xeon-e3> References: <1462461300-9962-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <1462461300-9962-2-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, declan.doherty@intel.com To: Bernard Iremonger Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f172.google.com (mail-pf0-f172.google.com [209.85.192.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508563978 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 19:12:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf0-f172.google.com with SMTP id y69so39445938pfb.1 for ; Thu, 05 May 2016 10:12:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1462461300-9962-2-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, 5 May 2016 16:14:56 +0100 Bernard Iremonger wrote: > Fixes: a45b288ef21a ("bond: support link status polling") > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger You know an uncontested reader/writer lock is significantly slower than a spinlock.